Monday, July 29, 2013

NEVIS Review No 22 , Section II, Ref # 22.2



NEVIS Review No 22

Section II ( Danny Arku’s Section)

Ref # 22.2

July 29, 2013
-------------------------
 [Original post by Danny Arku, on May 2013]

Yesterday afternoon, I had to go to a public enterprise to get some service. While I was infuriated at the long line (a sign of inefficiency!), standing in a scorching sun as they don't even have bench for customers to sit in), another thing, which I think is even more shameful, happened to me.

Two foreigners, a white-man /a Westerner and an Indian, then went straight to the guard and asked him to let them pass without the need to wait in the line like the rest of us. I overheard their conversation with the guard, and realized that they are there to get the same service like mine. When the guard seemed to let them pass, I run and jumped into their midst, and exclaimed, " Lemin tasalifachawaleh .lemin...min silehonu  [ loose translation: why do you let them cut the line and let them pass..why and who are they after all?]

The guard replied, " Engida nachew..minale'' [ They are guests. It is ok.. why not let them pass?!..]. Then we had a quarrel with the guard, and to my utter surprise and fury, the people who were in the same line with me also tried to sooth me by saying ,  " yilefu..engida nachew aydel...minale bitasalifachew.."[ It is ok..why don’t you let them pass..they are guests, aren’t they? ).
I was alone in this apparently little but important quarrel. Every one was against me and I had to fight alone. Notwithstanding this, I insisted and the supervisor of the company intervened. I told him that by doing such favors in the name of the abused term of 'engida' [guest], you are disgracing the dignity of your own citizens, manifesting self-disrespectfulness, and encouraging foreigners to break your own company law of equality and fairness-'first come, first served'. The supervisor also parroted the misinterpreted say talk about " Abesha engida tekebay aydel ..ende minew?!"[ Isn’t abesha hospitable..Why do you resist].
.After some verbal disputes with the supervisor that went on for some minutes, I seem to have won, and the two foreigners were then taken back to the last line. But the problem is not this single isolated incident, but actually deeper..What is going on, my friends?
----
[Discussions/Comments]
 Betty Negash Woldeyohannes :I hear you Danny Arku surprised by the so called 'Supervisor' s' reaction though! esu endeza kasebe zebegnochu min yiferedibachewal!? sewochachin, including the boss guy there are way too far from recognizing the value of Time!
--------------------------
Hallelujah Lulie: A number of friends on Facebook have encountered such situations and written about it expressing their anger and frustration. I think Tsedi Lemma and Daniel Kibret could add on this. We pride as a proud nation never colonized, and with a rich cultural and historical identity. However we find ourselves honoring the white skinned and in your situation the yellow and brown foreigners at the expense of our dignity, time and privilege. Bewketu Seyoum once wrote on the Reporter an interesting analysis examining the possible sources for such a mentality referring to an incident in one of the traditional restaurants in Addis. I loved that piece so much, will post it if I get it. The other way to look at the problem is from the perspective of the 'White Privilege' theory. The while people who ask for such privileges believe that they deserve better service and treatment just because of the color is lighter than other customers.
-------------------------

Mesfin Tekle :Danny, I did the same thing at the airport while paying for an extra luggage. A foreigner tried to cut a line and I gently told him would you do the same thing if it was your own country? You're abusing our respect & silence for foreigners. I suggest you go back & line up like everyone else. He went back to the end of the line with his head down. The great thing was unlike the people in your case those who were lining up with me agreed & scolded him. That may be because they have lived outside Ethiopia & know that no one should break a cue regardless of who he/she is. We've to break that culture but we also have to admit we've our own queue breakers who seem to get a service without even showing up. As Rodriguez would say that's a cold fact.

-----------------
Gezahegn Anbelu: Let me share this story .A sophomore at Addis Ababa University was introduced to a gentleman from some Scandinavian countries. He proposed and unquestionably his proposal was accepted .The thing is the proposal was perceived as blessing in disguise .She quit her school and went on marrying the man with mini wedding held at one of these mushrooming Hotels in Addis .To make the long story short, after a couple of months of honeymooning, the man who promised to take her to his home country disappeared. Why? Lo and behold the man had already left for his country without leaving a trace. And some folks who did their best to know about this man finally came to know that the man was lawfully married in his home country and actually had two kids. You can imagine the emotional and moral damage such tragedy could bring to this young lady . The thing is the man was simply having his vacation. Actually, for him, she was one of the “packages “.DEGRADING. Sometimes I ask myself is it because we are poor that we “worship” the ferenji .But still some of the most brilliant individual who could leave a comfortable life in their home country leave for the “Dreamland”. I think there should be some reorientation in knowing our identity.
----------------------------
Yona Bir: It is very controversial issue. I totally understand your frustration and probably I would do the same, if I were in your place in that scorching sun.
But the case is not simple and a current phenomenon. We need to ask as to how and when did we start being Engida Teqebay? What is the significance of Engida Teqebayinet? I think this is one of the oldest brands that we built as an Ethiopian national Brand. This culture doesn't pop up today but it has a long cultural element. Ethiopians had a very old culture to host a complete stranger person, for a sleep over in their house, with full facility and dignity. Even today, you may find such experience in villages. They do it by leaving their bed and washing a stranger feet without getting a dime for the service. The stranger may ask respectfully, "Ye'Egzer Mengedegna asadrugn" In addition to this cultural background, we built the so called “Hospitality” brand as a national tourist attraction.
So when I come to your specific experience, I can see why you were singled out in that debate. It looks like our people accept our Engida Teqebayinet. The government and media are working hard to propagate this slogan in every single AU summit. Engida teqebay yehonew hizib yetelemede tibibrun yarig!!! ... However, if you see it from the view point of hard currency generating mechanism, considering the foreigners pay in hard currency, you may be delighted for letting them go on your turn. Finally, the reverse is true when we go to any European country. You may stand in a queue for hours in a custom check. That is because you are a foreigner (Ethiopian) but they pass by the other door only since they are an EU member citizen. So, Should we revise our Engida Teqebayinet again
Danny?
--------------------------
Tsedi Lemma :Thanks Dannycho. Hallelujah - I have had a couple of similar outrageous encounters in the past…I believe our own people are acting the way they are because when they see a "ferenji" they see a walking wallet coming into them, or they get a spark of hope for a better life, or the sudden urge to show fellow countrymen around that they can speak to these dudes in English, or a better tip in the case of Bewketu's article (which I also liked very much). Matter of fact! Let me take the hit by cutting that "engida tekebay" crap […]The last time this happened to me, as Mesfin, was in the Airport here whereby I gently told the dude "we are all here looking for the same service that you think you should get first." It worked.
-------------
Hiwot Wendimagegn:  Danny, this is an issue close to my heart and as you said, its implications are immense....

One fact I have always found enticing is how the part of the brain that is responsible for SUBMISSIVENESS dominated the brains of most slaves during the Atlantic Slave Trade. Slavery didn't survive solely by the domination of the whites but also by the meekness of the blacks. While working on the fields, thousands of black slaves were managed by one white man with a whip, making you wonder why didn't they just rise up and kill him? Where was their pride, their dignity and their will to say no to injustice? The fact that they were recipients and not givers had broken their spirit and robbed them of their self respect.

Anyhow, the point is, the supposed superiority of the whites and the imagined inferiority of the blacks is engrained in the brains of most 3rd world people, manifesting itself in situations like the ones you faced yesterday.

------------------------------
Hailemichael Lemma: Danny: as I always say and as to my observation, this is a product of ‘’deprived-self-Esteem’’ side of our identity crises that we suffer, in addition to what Tsedi has already stated above.

Shockingly, this ‘’deprived-self-esteem’’ increase with the color of the whiter foreigners such as Chinese, Indians and the white west. As a result, we treat/value as if they are superior to us. On the side, it decreases with the Blacker/African foreigners, because they are relatively darker than us and treat/value them as if they are inferior to us.

Hence, we may observe that the term foreigner in the mind of our people only refers to the west-whites/Ferenjis. For the supervisor and the rest people against you, ‘’engida’’ means Ferenjis with negligible doubt. I guess you wouldn’t have been alone had these guys been Nigerians or Kenyans.  Damn to realize that we, Ethiopians, are not realizing who we were/are!
------------------------ 
Danny Arku :I agree with most of you guys above. But I don't agree with Yona Bir, Yonas, you seem to imply that it is ok- let's get this straight: are you saying that the attitude of the people is an acceptable and morally defensible, not to mention the fact that it is an attitude that is coming from people who pride themselves for not being colonized. Plus, what ever damn trifle foreign exchange they bring, are you saying that the citizen have to be treated as a second rate? Are we willing to sell our dignity to buy some hard currency? What does "engiga tekebay" mean, and what are its limits- does it mean volunteering and/or compelled to degrade oneself for the sake of the guest and an associated economic payoff? I didn't get you when you said , "However, if you see it from the view point of hard currency generating mechanism, considering the foreigners pay in hard currency, you may be delighted for letting them go on your turn"
--------------------------
Dawit Teferra : Privileges of a stranger are due to the host's provisions. It's not untrue that in Ethiopia we have this sentiment of respecting 'guests' - irrespective of skin color (or their whereabouts). This may be expressed in so many ways and one could be by letting 'guests' get services on priority. Accepting and exceptionally treating of strangers has been among the popular cultures of our ancestors for very long. Case of accepting strangers, treating them with the best the household could offer, washing their feet, leaving own bed for them, ... on departure, sparing own time and resources to accompany them to some distance ... these are amazing but were common in our land.

This, however, by no means should be confused with recklessly yielding in to some strangers' such disrespectful attempts. Tough alone at the scene, your fight was a brave one , Danny. The situation you confronted was an indication of a currently building up sad situation, self-disrespect. Really sad. But I still see this sad fact dissociated from color or something of the sort. Whoever tries to abuse our rights, most of us don't have the willpower to stand and stop it. This is clearly expressed in our inert responses to disrespectful treatments by many service providers, examples: taxis, hotels, financial service outlets, utility companies ... .
------------------------------------
Danny Arku :Spot on, Dave, Thanks Dawit Teferra for your insight.
---------------------------

Tamrat Wuletaw : I highly laud Danny's vociferous complaints. We say we are the only nation that was not colonized by western powers but our deeds recently reflect the exact opposite. We have become a consummate Ferenji - Worshipers. Poverty plays a huge role in intensifying this societal disorder. Ultimately, it is the job of the enlightened citizens to set right what is bended in the society. As a result, I would like to thank Danny for his determined stance against his own citizens in pursuing justice at local level.

-------------------------- 
Yona Bir: Danny Please don’t get me wrong. I am not saying we should subordinate our dignity for the sake of hard currency. But I am saying we give priority to foreigners (“foreigners” to mean all non-Ethiopians not only ferenjis) for the following three reasons.
1. Giving priority is a gentleman (woman) act in our culture (it is just like a “ladies first” slogan). Most guests consider this relationship as a gentleman act not as subordinate and superior relation. But I know there are some people who abuse this privilege. This service giving mentality is completely different from other African nations “Ferenj first”mentality. I visited few African countries and noticed the impact of colonization and I don’t think our act is the same. Btw, the foreigners tell you the difference between Ethiopia and other Africa nations.
Tsedi and Hallelujah Lulie may help us by asking the foreigners as to how they see our Engida Teqebayinet.  2. Almost everywhere, foreigners pay more for the same service. As to my knowledge, Ethiopia is a unique country to put price discrimination for citizens and foreigners. AAU charge 50 Birr for a student copy to all Ethiopian citizens but USD 50 for foreigners (20 times more). As an economist, you may help me about the relationship between premium price and service quality.  3. Our government is trying hard to pull hard currency and attract foreign investment. That is why I said it is controversial but I think it is an active citizen duty to facilitate the weak service quality for guests by giving them priority. Image building Endilu.
-----------------
Menbere Getachew : Danny, change starts from oneself, I applaud your determination to voice your opinion even when all the people around you at the moment were against it. preferential treatment for 'ferengie' happens all the time in Ethiopia, especially in the so-called tourist cities, i remember this incident in Gondar a while back when I was waiting in a very long line to use the ATM, a local guide with two 'ferengies' came over and told us to let them cut in line so as to show our hospitality, the guy in front asked him 'would they do the same if we go to their country?'. Everyone laughed with the question and the two 'ferengies' stood in line just like everyone else. None of the tourist attraction places in the US I have had the opportunity to visit give priority to tourists in the name of encouraging cash inflow (maybe we need a research to check the causality between hospitality and money earned through tourism). I am sick and tired of people saying 'engida tekbaynet bahlachen' I don't believe culture is something that is engraved on stone that should be passed from one generation to another unchanged, it is a dynamic and evolving interaction with our environment. So, if this culture is making us be treated like second class citizen in our own country, IT IS TIME TO CHANGE IT.
------------------------
Yared WoldeGiorgis : Dear Danny , I have a brief encounters at Bole International airport ,,I remember the time was just quarter to midnight , we are queuing to get entry visa at Addis abeba , The ferenjis are way back on the queue , a guy came and picked this ferenjis way back to issue them a visa . Most of US getting tired of long flight, then we started shouting at the guy why they are a priority to you? he said they are " engedoch , makber alebachu " his reply makes the situation more worse .The ferenjis having realized the inconvenience they said sorry , and went back to their place , "ferenjis" have a long culture or tradition of queuing to get any service , be it bank or supermarket , they usually ask permission from the front person if they are in some kind of hurry .This situation is prevalent in most African countries .But Ethiopians makes this more uncomfortable to their own people , there is a saying " Nigus be ageru ayekeberim " our traditional " terets" will tell us who we are . Thanks to our " Teret" we will remain forever like this way . Colony ..white ,black minamin is just A pretext , our life is highly influenced by THE LIFE ON "TERET TERET "
-------------------------
Henock Y. Tessemma :  Danny I think our conflicted attitude toward "ferenjoch" is pretty obvious. Not only do "ferenjoch" jump queues with impunity, they can also enter buildings without search in many places; they enjoy much more attention than locals in many offices;they are generally considered to be brilliant and efficient (the common Amharic saying "Egziabher ferenjin yesseraw ejun tatbo new" says it all"). And all this happens in Ethiopia, a nation that prides itself on unbroken independence that spans millennia. I used to think the "ferenj amlakinet" was a recent phenomenon until I read Teklehawariat Teklemariam complaining in his memoir that, ironically enough, a "ferenj" matter-of-factly walked through a congested crowed (the Adwa Generation, mind you) at Arada Giorgis gathered to see Emperor Menilik.Yet many Ethiopians still believe "Habehsa" is the most beautiful, the most courageous, race--yes, race--with the earliest civilization on earth.Our songs are replete with annoying self-righteous mantras extolling the perceived virtues of "Habesha". The civilizational/technological gap, economic problems and other factors might have collided head-on with the huge historical ego many Ethiopians have to cause the apparent ambivalence. As for "engida tekebayinet", that is, sorry to say, a complete […].I would have considered that argument if people from other African countries could get even a fraction of the royal treatment, so to speak, "ferenjoch" enjoy.
-----------------------------------
Danny Arku :Thank you all for your robust ust reflections, as usual.

----------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------
(Ed’s note- As usual, the NEVIS ET’s disclaimer: we would like to remind NEVISers that all the opinions which Danny and his discussant express in the forthcoming series of articles are their personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEVIS, the society or the editorial team ET. NEVISers who didn’t participate in the discussion are welcome to add their reflection here in this issue in the comment section. Those who already did participate are free to add/modify their opinion. We have presented the conversations above exactly as they first appeared for the sake of originality and authenticity, except  for minor editing of spelling and grammatical errors. NEVIS ET*)

NEVIS Review No 22 , Section I , Ref #22.1


NEVIS Review No 22

Section I

Ref # 22.1

July 29, 2013
---------------------
Africa: transformation, more than just growth
By Annemarie van de Vijsel  
                
(Source:  http://thebrokeronline.eu) 
 
African economic transformation should be inclusive, but how can this be achieved? Experts discussed this at the launch of the preview of the 2013 African Transformation Report.
African economies cannot transform if not everyone is included in the process. That is what all the speakers agreed on at the seminar entitled, ‘Challenges and potentials of African economic transformation: can economic transformation be inclusive?’. The more complex question at this seminar, which was held at the Institute of Social Studies (ISS) in The Hague, is how economic transformation and inclusiveness should be achieved.
Yaw Ansu considers employment to be the key driver of economic inclusiveness. He is chief economist of the African Center for Economic Transformation (ACET) in Accra, Ghana. 'We want economic transformation because it leads to more jobs and thus to inclusion', he said. The focus should not, however, be just on jobs. In Ansu’s view, they should be productive because that will also lead to more inclusion. And production should be based on science and technology.
By saying this, Ansu touched on two elements that ACET sees as necessary for economic transformation. Besides productivity and technology, Africa also needs diversification, export competitiveness and human well-being for such a change to take place. This is the main point made in the 2013 African Transformation Report, of which ACET launched the preview at the seminar in The Hague.
Economic growth is important but, as the report states, ‘economic growth alone will not sustain development on the continent’. What is needed, according to the report, is growth through the structural shifts from traditional agriculture to modern agriculture, manufacturing, and high-value services. This is broadly acknowledged. But there’s more. It is growth through expanding the technical capabilities of people and institutions. It is growth through upgrading the technologies that people use on farms, in firms, and at government offices. It is growth through becoming internationally competitive and active participants in global value chains. And it is growth through spreading prosperity by supporting productive work and boosting consumption.’1
'Thus it is that a transforming economy – more than just a growing economy – can weather the ups and downs of global product and service markets, the alternating liquidity and illiquidity of local and global financial markets, and the vicissitudes of commodity and construction booms. Thus it is that a Ghana can become a South Korea, a Senegal a Thailand, and a Kenya a Malaysia.'1
Economic transformation is not easy, as the report’s title shows, describing the current state of the African economy: ‘Growing rapidly, transforming slowly’. However, as Professor Peter Knorringa from ISS noted, 'economic transformation is not an end in itself'. Someone from the audience remarked that the report seems to assume that economic transformation automatically leads to inclusiveness. 'But does it?', he asked the speakers. In general, it does not. Incentives are needed.
As Jeroen Roodenburg from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointed out, access to finance, public infrastructure and education and skills are important for inclusive growth. Mr Ansu agreed with him that education and skills matter. 'We have to give children the skills to participate in the new economy that we want to create', he said.
André Lelieveld of the African Studies Centre in Leiden explained that the promotion of commercial farming among small subsistence farmers can make the agricultural sector more inclusive. The growth of regional food markets can be a catalyst for economic transformation. In his view, however, it is important that more women are involved in commercial farming.
Although the issue of inclusiveness is important in the preliminary African Transformation Report, some speakers at the seminar argued that it should receive more attention and that a more detailed approach should be adopted to achieving an inclusive economy. The founder and current president of ACET, Mr Amoako, agreed. 'The African Transformation Report touches upon the transformation of economies for inclusive growth. This is also one of the pillars of the report of the High Level Panel on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. I agree that the African Transformation Report does not sufficiently address this topic.'
One matter that was not discussed at the seminar is the role of different actors in the process of economic transformation. What should the governments of the African countries do and what are the tasks of the African Union, the World Bank, the European Union and China for example?
ACET staff are travelling to several countries around the world to get feedback on the preliminary report. They aim to use this feedback for the final version of the 2013 African Transformation Report that is to be launched in October. However, it is important that one of the strengths of the report remains intact: the fact that it has been written ‘from within’: by African experts themselves.
References
[1] ACET (2013), Growing rapidly – Transforming slowly. Preview of the 2013 African Transformation Report, p.1
(Ed’s note- The Preview of the 2013 African Transformation Report referred to in the above article can be found following the links in the same website we earlier indicated as a source. Annemarie van de Vijsel works at The Broker as a project editor on the themes Inclusive economy and Social entrepreneurship. Previously, she worked at The Broker as a junior research editor. Annemarie studied Journalism and Media (master) and International Development Studies (research master) at the University of Amsterdam and holds a Bachelor’s degree in Human geography from Utrecht University.)
------------------------------//------------------------------------------------------


Monday, July 15, 2013

NEVIS Review No 21 , Section II, Ref # 21.2


NEVIS Review No 21
Section II (Danny Arku’s Section) 
Ref# 21.2
July 15, 2013
 
-------------------------

(Ed’s note:
It is to be recalled Danny Arku , the founder and Editor-In-Chief of NEVIS, so far contributed only  one article some months ago titled “Is objectivity an oxymoron in contemporary journalistic reporting and analysis?: A reflection to shed light on the issue. “ in NEVIS Review No 4, Section  II,  Ref# 4.2. It can be found :http://nevis-review.blogspot.com/2013/03/nevis-review-no-4-section-ii.html
He has now decided to contribute a series of articles (both previously written and new ones) together with their (facebook) discussion of his insightful circle of friends. We have labeled the section “Danny Arku’s section”. We would like to remind NEVISers that all the opinions which Danny and his discussant express in the forthcoming series of articles are their personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of NEVIS, the society or the editorial team ET.
In this section, we want to present you the amazing facebook discussion which was held a year ago (on July 22, 2012, to be exact)  where Danny asked “Why are we Ethiopians still poor?”. Since the discussion were very interesting, valuable, interdisciplinary, we are presenting them here under exactly as they first appeared for the sake of originality and authenticity, except minor editing for few spelling and grammatical errors. It is hoped that documentation of discussions would stimulate further thought and research on the issue and will serve as a knowledge database. At last, we want to thank Danny and his friends for their reflection on such an important issue. Note: NEVISers who didn’t participate in the discussion are welcome to add their reflection here in this issue in the comment section. Those who already did participate are free to add/modify their opinion.
Enjoy!
NEVIS ET*)
---------------------
Danny Arku [Main thread]: One of the blessings of Facebook is the ease with which and the possibility that people from different corners of the world and from multiple disciplines can discuss on issues of importance/interest. Accordingly, I would like to hold a discussion here on the question which is always on the mind of every Ethiopian. This question is:" Why are we Ethiopians still poor, as compared with other countries; A) what do you think are the THREE major reasons for the relative backwardness of our country and B) what do you suggest can be done to solve the problem you cited in A
NB. I am referring to economic poverty. For convenience we can use UN Human Development Indicator, 2011, where Ethiopia is ranked 174 out of 187 countries (at the bottom). Although there is increasing trend in the HDI index, its current index is too low. We can even examine its GDP at PPP and compare it with other countries, growing though it is, its current GDP is too low. So in this context, Ethiopia is definitely “poor” but growing.
 [Discussions]
 Yemesrach Yohannes
May be we all are settled for less. All of our believe systems designed in a way to make our thinking low. This is what "God" gave you, So accept it, Be thankful for it & Live with it .... Kind of continuous teaching.
-----------------
Henock Y. Tessemma:
Danny, it seems to me that it would be better and more interesting to deal with the flip side of your question: Why are we Ethiopians still wondering why we are not rich, whatever that means? In fact, do we have sufficient reason to expect to have done any better?
-----------------
Anania Sorri:
I think we Ethiopians are 'poor' b/c we lost ourselves in 'modernization'. First, we need to identify and clearly define what "Poverty" is. Second, why are we poor if we are indeed 'poor' in every angle of the definition of the word? I think we are not poor environmentally, socially, culturally, spiritually, and mentally. But, we are poor economically and politically. Economically- financial capital. Politically-democratic governance system. Therefore, we need to be conscious in what aspect we are poor and not. Only after that, we can discuss why. What do you think guys?
-----------------
Dawit Teferra:
Right Danny, the social-media have fundamentally changed our lives.
Let me raise the points which I consider as reasons for our relative
backwardness:
1. With distinct history of passionate association with the three major Abrahamic religions, Ethiopia, for millennia, had been alienated from the attributes which would help develop 'worldly (secular) wisdom' and 'material wealth'. The superior achievements on the spiritual arena show where our ancestors considered their treasures to be (for where your treasure is, there your heart will be also -the Holy Bible).
2. Our introvert and complacent culture which severely impaired our ability to exchange any idea or material with the 'aliens'.
3. Our history of domestic feud
My suggestions are:
Government policies for development should give due attention to providing far reaching and well founded education to the people. Education liberates us from our wrong conceptions about material wealth.
Knowing the fact about our situations would stir sense of regret among us which would make us committed to pay what it takes to get away with the prevailing shameful state.
Also big efforts should be exerted to create national consensus on matters relating to the country's direction to reduce poverty.
-----------------
Fisseha Fantahun:
I'll try to put my ideas as precise as I can get. If it is Ethiopia weighted against the developed world, I would have to say that the main underlying problem is of external nature. The international political economic system has put us in the position which we are in now. Other internal political, leadership, societal, individual, etc problems, in this regards, are more of symptoms-nothing more. BUT, if it is about why we are specifically the least of the least developed, I would say it’s just because some country is supposed to be at Ethiopia's current status and unfortunately it is Ethiopia. But my point is, in the political economic scene, things are not as such ideal (NO WIN-WIN scenario) as they are much said. Reality (ZERO-SUM) is what is being practiced. That is to mean, we are crippled because of the zero-sum game the external international system is allowing (more of persuading) us with our counter least developed countries. DOWN TO EARTH: we are located in one of the few fragile geopolitical position (ahun kalitefa bota Ethiopia'n wesido kend laye mesekaten min ametaw ale Be'ewiketu) in the world. Why? That would be a complicated issue. But let’s just pass that by: We re made to be so. The thing is we are here n what is to be done??????? I would say, we need a wise leadership that can handle the external pressure for perusing a path for development (Let’s forget democracy here, I can live with good governance) and who can hold on to the internal tension that are expected to prevail until foreseeable future; until at least the average living standard becomes somehow decent (that's vague, I know, but I hope u all understand me by what I mean descent)
Esubalew Haile:
@Danny, Many thanks for giving us a chance to discuss this wide but important issue! In my opinion, there are many factors affecting one another. In addition, each factor could be potentially a cause and or an effect. Having said that, I put the following factors in order of their significance. 1, Lack of good governance which is usually a result of 'bad' policy designed to prolong a regime. (2) Our history which is predominantly of continuous war and conflict. (3) Our belief system regarding life in general. i.e poor sense of ownership and responsibility for our country and its people leading to contemplate to work for change and better life.... What should be done? I think the so called 'elite' should take the lead and work on how we can establish a democratically elected government with limited terms to stay in power. I believe this is basic. We need to clearly write up our history and teach the people so that we can learn what was beneficial for us. This job should be left for the scholars alone. It is then, that both the government and its people would have a common goal to achieve. It is then, that we all have a sense of ownership and full responsibility for our country. That is how we can prevent internal conflicts and close the doors for external forces and hence make war history.
---------------------
Kumlachew Getu:
The root cause of poverty is poverty itself....all could be summed up in this way most of the reasons that works for the poverty of other economically poor countries also works for Ethiopia except certain peculiarities . Those reasons have been studied for half a century since the emergence of development economics as a separate discipline.
---------------------
 Natnail Feleke:
Danny, witnessing the blessings of FB yet again here reading the comments!
A. A common interest has been lacking in for a better Ethiopia! It is like each clique of society is more concerned about things that directly affect its primary surrounding. An extension of this problem is that we don't trust each other. One sect in one way or another is skeptical of any novel idea/initiation just because it is raised by someone from outside a circle. And because there is no national interest for which people can link it too, the idea is considered to represent and do good only to one sect. This makes good ideas/initiatives capable of pulling us away from the chronic poverty either to fail miserably or not to surface at all due to a perceived lack of acceptability and endorsement.
B. The forgotten poor. Government policies failed to directly address root problems of the poor and sometimes lacked consistency. Whenever there was/is growth, it seems to be larger for the tiny rich than the greater poor.
What can be done?
A. We should work on bringing friendly and enthusiastic national projects to the forefront and try to always refrain from linking them to any single clique. (The Abay dam project is a good example, but the incumbent is working hard to stick the project with its legacy).
B. Push investment in sectors where the poor is abundantly. A seriously planned and strategically implemented Agricultural Investment policy. The poorest poor are located in rural Ethiopia engaged somehow in agriculture; a policy that reaches them effectively will for sure impact the overall country.
---------------------
Zelalem Zewdie:
To me the main reason is that 1, Lack of respect for ourselves. To me it is great thing we lost . Once I meet a man who lived in U.S.A FOR LONG time. He said that his American friend told him ''be proud of being Ethiopian '' and he continued “have you seen Lalibela?” and the man replied ''no'' the American man said “Shame on you!” . 2, We lack a habit of tolerance/respect for each other . In Ethiopian history we developed a bad habit that blaming each other based on hasty generalization. 3, Pro-westernization, especially not their work habits rather their Hollywood made culture 4, Giving less value for knowledge.....
---------------------
Adiam Hagos:
A lot can be said about the reasons behind the country’s backwardness. As a couple of people have indicated above, the country’s previous experience of poverty contributes to the current state. Poverty has the tendency of sustaining itself. Many studies have shown that a person from a poor family is likely to remain poor. It is, therefore, important to look deep into the sheer nature of the dynamics of poverty in the country and nip the factors that are sustaining it from their roots. In addition, policies must be made envisaging the long term consequences along with the short term effects to which more attention seems to be paid.
The need for a common understanding about the current status of the country and setting out a common goal must also be heeded. I think this will help us organize our resources in the best possible way.
---------------------
Goldneh Gebeyehu:
I have learned a lot from the above explanations and suggestions.
Danny Arku thank you for the question you raised and your invitation. I think EPRDF also believes that the root cause of most crises in Ethiopia is our socioeconomic status. That might be the reason for the ruling party to state "Poverty" as the only enemy Ethiopia has. Any one, any group, any institution, any country that has money (fund) can call us to a meeting and can lead us to the valley of death. This might seem an insult, but a fact that shouldn't be denied. So Danny dealing with such question will help us to think on curing the disease than treating the signs and symptoms. For me poverty is a symptom, or let it be a disease, but its causative agents should be dealt well.
---------------------
Shimelies Ahmed:
Limited resources and climatic inconsistencies should be mentioned as major factors in this regard, in my opinion. However, the pull from those should have been overcome by an effective mobilization of human resources, as it was the case in other countries. But, such was not the case of ours. We own a thick history of wasting man power due to: (1) lack of education (or proper education), (2) attitude and awareness problems- leading to unproductiveness (3) lack of appropriate agricultural, economic and marketing strategies, and (4) shackles from the successive civil wars (or wars). Anyhow, I like the post Danny !!
---------------------
Mukemil Bedru Sabir
Some points:
1. Lack of entrepreneurial culture which hampered z private sector from playing vibrant role.
2. Failed leadership due to capacity problem.
3. Party motivated policies that are failed.
4. Lack of democracy/ dictator leaders so far in our history
---------------------
Danny Arku
Thanks
Sabr Ibn and Shimelies Ahmed, very brief but pointed remarks. Shimelis, you reminded me of what the great economist of 20 the century Sen, said on famine, "No famine has ever taken place in the history of the world in a functioning democracy,'' There is an articles casting doubt on the above assertion of Sen: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/01/arts/does-democracy-avert-famine.html Does Democracy Avert Famine? - New York Times                ---------------------
---------------------
Yona Bir
Danny, I was busy and wanted to dig a little bit further about this thrilling topic and came up with a research kind of analysis, instead of forwarding my opinion from the top of my head. Before putting my points here, I want to limit the time span within the last 150 years only (on the history of modern Ethiopia).

Our problem is very complicated and diversified which can be categorized as cultural, political, geopolitical and historical facts.

The first point is, Ethiopia has been applied a Eurocentric educational system (modern schooling) since the opening the first school (Minilik school) and sent a lot of young people to Europe and America universities to higher education. What do we get out of that? Can these elites solve the actual problem on the ground and modernize the public life. No, the education system has not been applying to address our problems. The very good example is, though, we have had a lot of scientists and engineers, and we are still using the OX dependent farming which is our main production sector that employs more than 80% of the total population. Did you notice the instrument called MOFER? It is made out of a single metal. How come we fail to make at least two over these 2000 years? Our culture doesn’t encourage entrepreneur. We insult people as faQi, Ketikach, kutit Betash…etc.

The second major contributing factor is the lack of visionary leader. This includes from Kebele to the premiership position of the country and in all bureaucracy and private sectors. I may include the problem of democracy here. Ethiopia has seen only three leaders within for the last 100 years (almost a century). HIM H/Selase was very visionary when he first came to power, but after half a century, he became the most corrupt, outdated and visionless leader. The dergue regiem is a complete loss in Ethiopian history. Among many things, Derg eradicated one educated, vibrant and nationalist generation in the name of Red Terror. In addition to that Derg took the country many years back economically (the socialist ideology coupled with the long civil awaited war). I don’t have the exact figure now but from Ethiopian Economics class in the AAU, I remember, the per capita income decreased in many folds from HIM to Mengsitu time. When we come to EPRDF regime, they were sleeping in the first 10 years and trying to move ambitiously in the second half of their period. But there are some problems regarding EPRDF, which they should address before anything. ERRDF don’t believe on educated people. I remember once Ato Meles said, “We don’t care about educational background of our ministers as long as they are loyal for EPRDF.” Such kind of party based promotion and assignment led the country to nepotism, corruption, inability and failing to organize and incorporate the majority of people towards change.

The last point is historic and geopolitical fact. Ethiopia is located in Africa and this means that we have been suffering from:-
- the legacy of colonization (the east Africa conflicts between all countries and the tribal and Ethnic problem)
- The climate problem in sub Saharan Africa
- The lack of skilled man power and brain drain
---------------------
Danny Arku:
@ Sabir, on your #1 point, you have brought the untouched area of entrepreneurship. Since almost all economists believe in the market as best way to effectively coordinate resource, and since the private firms have usually been the engines of economic growth in most countries, it is an area worth investigating. Sabir, since you have worked for long time now on that area, you may share us the nexus between entrepreneurship and poverty reduction.thanks for your intervention.
---------------------
Yodit N. Gedamu:
Hello
Danny,

Thank you for your invitation to discuss this topic. he best way to address any issue of importance is to speak on it within the framework of your field of specialization and, if I might add, to stop being afraid of the words "I don't know". In doing this we can begin to paint a more accurate picture of what is, and what is not going on.

With that in mind, please allow me to add these points to the discussion. As a social scientist, these are my thoughts on the question. You will find my response starts with (I) an explanation of the critiques of statistical collection & methodology, (II) consequences of framing questions in this way, and (III) the challenges that they present in development.

On the topic of: "Why are we Ethiopians still poor, as compared with other countries; A) what do you think are the THREE major reasons for the relative backwardness of our country and B) what do you suggest can be done to solve the problem you cited in A"

I. Critiques of Statistical Collection & Methodology

***** What is the question asking & saying? *****

The question as it is posed above is saying as much, if not more, than it is asking. What has been most recently coined as "Eurocentrism" has imbedded in it certain impositions that shape/reshape identity, particularly for "people of color". Evidence of "Disagency" are among the most frequent and obvious indicators of those impositions. One way of identifying "disagency" is by looking at a text and seeing if it is exhibiting signs of sociologist Willie Canon-Brown's litmuses for determining if a text/context (1) Exist through the prism of a cultural prospective that is outside of the society (ie: Ethiopianism being described through the values of the WASP, African American, Chinese, etc..) and/or (2) Exists without the cultural presence of the society.

The litmus of these two categories is an assessment of 3 elements; language, attitude and direction.

Language: Without being too sensitive to writing styles/questioning that uses occasional irony or sarcasm to make a point, look at the language being used and determine its cultural accuracy. Whose cultural standpoint does the language represent? If any?

Attitude: Refers to a predisposition to respond in a characteristic way to some idea, situation, person, etc... This is basically literary stereotyping. If it occurs, who's stereotypical standpoint is present in the undertone/overtone of the question.

Direction: Direction is the continuity in how you express themes, sentiments, interests, etc... You can pinpoint the direction by looking at the symbols, tropes and analogies that a writer uses. Are they rooted in the cultural prospective of someone else? or of noone at all?

Evaluating the Language, Attitude and Direction of the question will pinpoint how/if it directs the resulting answers to affirm what is known as "Disagency" by stripping the subject of (1) an interest in a psychological/sociological location, (2) a commitment to finding the Ethiopian subject place, (3) the defense of cultural elements, (4) a commitment to lexical refinement, and (5) a commitment to correct the dislocations in Ethiopian history.

II. Consequences of Framing Questions in this way

*****Consequences of Disagency in Data Collection & Statistical Reporting *****

What Cannon-Brown identifies as "disagency" is noted in a collection of essays & critics regarding statistical calculations & methodology compiled by Tukufu Zuberi & Eduardo Bonilla-Silva. This collection brings together an array of scholars in various fields which identify how the ways in which questions are framed serve to compile seemingly unbiased reports that become the numerical epistemology of nations which often skewed by a collective subjectivity that masquerades as an objective lens. Socially, it creates a deficit mentality as the subject nation/people begin to aspire towards either affirming or negating this false image of themselves.

III. Challenges to Development

*****Moving Forward*****

Here in, lies the challenge in moving forward. As we abandon more traditional norms of digesting foreign philosophy, thought, art, literature, etc... and breaking them down to their most fundamental and functional components so that we can then reconstruct them in our own cultural likeness and make them reflect our own values; we are opening ourselves up to this more subtle deficit thinking that may be more insidious to rid ourselves of. It is the first step towards making ourselves bystanders in our own historical narrative.

In the area of development, those cultures suffering from a prevailing sociological standpoint of disagency are often unable to evolve functional educational or economic systems to promote their own interests. A prime example is that of the African American community in the United States.

Please pardon the very theoretical (and slightly lengthy) response to your question, but if we intend to get to the root of the issue that it is pointing to, then how we ask the question is just as important as what we are asking.
---------------------
---------------------
Yemesrach Yohannes:
This discussion is Amazing. Danny, you should create a close group called "Danny Circle". At the end, The discussion may evolve into some kind of action
---------------------
Yona Bir:
Shimels Ahmed I don't agree with your 'limited resource' argument. We have enough resource, at least to feed our own people. We have better resource comparing to many European, African, Asian countries but we are far behind them.
---------------------
Mesfin Tekle:
Danny, You posed questions that are complex to respond to but I'll try to answer them with my limited knowledge of our history both economic and political. By the way before I respond to the questions you posed, I like to remind you Mr.Sen's assertions that famines do not occur in democracies should not be taken as absolute. I've quoted him on some of my articles fully aware of the meaning. Unlike authoritarians who work hard to hide famine, in democracies famine can be exposed through a free press or other outlets before it gets to a critical stage and politicians will have to work hard to come up with solutions because their political career depends up on it. It's as simple as that. Democracy can expose the reality on the ground but unlike Mengistu's one time slogan it cannot control nature. 1) Why are we relatively poor compared to the rest of the world? Without getting in to complex economic theories about poverty let's look at the make up of our economy. We're an agrarian society. Even today in 2012 more than 80% of our populace work and live in rural Ethiopia and our population there is growing geometrically. Malthusian pessimism of population growth and diminishing returns may have outlived its usefulness in the developed world. But in agrarian societies like Ethiopia his pessimism about unchecked and unproductive population growth can’t be discounted. Ethiopia has a population of more than eighty million people, with greater than eighty percent relying on farming and is still on a state of permanent crisis whenever the rain fails to fall. Land to the tiller was the feel good slogan of the 1960’s student movement. But the end result was an ideology based on an unsustainable and impractical dogma which saw small low tech farming persist with continuous diminishing return for more than forty years. Developing mechanized commercial farming cannot be successful if the majority of land holding is occupied by small scale farmers who will have a hard time making a living from year to year with low tech farming that hasn’t improved for centuries. The percentage of farmers in the developed world that are feeding not only their population but also populations far and wide around the world are less than three percent of the total labour force. That says a lot about how far behind we are lagging from the rest of world. Productivity in Ethiopia and in Africa in general has been stagnant while population growth has exploded in the last century. Yet in Ethiopia where the majority of the population make their living as farmers, agricultural productivity leaves much to be desired. Severe weather conditions and primitive farming practices are part of the never ending challenges that have existed for years on end. In a modern world where labour based farming has progressively been moved to technology and knowledge based farming to enhance the productive value of the land; keeping the status quo ante is counter-productive. Governments have always grappled with the best way to move forward to improve the standard of living of the populace. But it is the less dogmatic practical governments who are willing to experiment that tend to come up with a solution that brings about positive change.
It’s important for a country like Ethiopia to concentrate on industries where its comparative advantage gives it an edge. With abundant labour and lower cost of doing business, expanding mechanized farming and low tech medium size industries can be used as a spring board to the next stage of development. Ethiopia also has to avoid the pitfalls of dual economy between urban and rural where a modern sector of the economy contrasts sharply with the rest of the economy. Wage differentials with the value of output per worker in different sectors of the economy can create a class of people who will have a hard time catching up to the fast moving modern economy.
There is always going to be a short term pain when ever disruptive ideas like technology or new way of doing things are applied. Dislocation of the old system is part and parcel of progress. Industrialization whether in agriculture or manufacturing initially is going to disproportionately favour investors and be less favourable to the working class. But in the long term innovation and productivity will lift all boats and create a fairer society that will enjoy the fruits of its hard work.
---------------------
Shimelies Ahmed:
Yonas, By limited resources- I was trying to indicate the fact that we don’t have immense natural wealth which could have counterbalanced the burden of poverty and backwardness. It was to say we are not endowed with vast natural gifts but we have limited resources. That, in the first place, creates peace between us and the reality. If there are facts against this though, I stand to be corrected.
But, whenever discussing this issue with my friends, as almost every Ethiopian does, I nearly prefer to look at what we lack in comparison with countries that are doing well, despite deficient natural resources, unfavorable climatic conditions, and destruction caused by war(s).
Given those three similar conditions between us and those countries, why are we still on the mud while they pulled themselves out?
Earlier this morning, a friend mentioned the lack of societal mindset of a ''sacrifice for a common good'' as one factor adding to the pull. I pondered for a while thinking ''that may be the reason why: (1) we don’t persist to detail and extend such conversations for long, and (2) such discussions amongst us end up only as mere conversations.

---------------------
Danny Arku
Mesfin Tekle, your penetrating analysis is appreciated. Yodit N. Gedamu, thanks for your foundational insight, that was a good vantage point, on a higher plane indeed, but I would also appreciate if you also include some direct answer to the question as it is phrased in the main note. Btw, my focus is on economic lagging behind, which is a painful fact.
---------------------
Yodit N. Gedamu:
Hello
Danny. As this is not an area that I am very familiar with, please excuse any unintentional error. Please correct me if I am wrong, but in its initial stages I believe that Ethiopia was on par, if not far advanced in the efficiency with which we exchanged goods and services both domestically and internationally (I am talking about in the early1400s). From what I understand, the shift was not a result of Ethiopia's lagging, but rather Europe's Turbo thrust and subsequent strategies to maintain their foothold.

While Europe was experiencing war, famine, plague, etc... we were reaping the benefits of the unity and infrastructure that came from an early Iron age revolution years before, like China was. Then Europe got a hold of something that was instrumental in the "Great Divergence" of the West, Free Labor & Raw Materials! The colonization of Africa gave Europe the economic advantage that allowed for the Commercial, Scientific and Industrial Revolutions (the measures of which became the litmus of our current understanding of development/underdevelopment). From the 1500s to the early 1800s all we saw was Europe milking and solidifying its advantage. As the development of Europe hit record rates via their African exploits in the late 1700s, Ethiopia entered the Zemene mesafint and Europe saw new markets in playing feudal lords against one another. From the unification of Ethiopia again under Atse Tewodros until tomorrow, we have and will continue to deal with constant external influences seeking to make Ethiopia an economically/politically dependent nation.

We have never been a people who, on mass, have really come to grips with the international interests in Ethiopia and therefore are left to explain things in terms of an Ethiopian deficiency/backwardsness. Hope comes in that Ethiopian solidarity is a foundational part of our identity and once the mechanisms of its undoing are identified, I believe that the people will reject those mechanisms whole-heartedly (minus a few banda here and there). So, I agree with many of the people who have stated that Education and domestic economic development are key to moving ourselves forward. However, I will point back to my previous post in that, the first and most pivotal step is for us to begin to measure ourselves by standards that were developed centric to our societal values and goals. Otherwise, we are entering into a game that is tilted against our success.
---------------------
Danny Arku:
Yodit N. Gedamu, thanks. I am glad that you brought the question which I have asked myself some years back, how to "measure ourselves by standards that were developed centric to our societal values and goals."
---------------------
Esubalew Haile:
"We need to make sure that we tackle the root cause of poverty and ethnic tension, which is the monopoly of the politics and economy by self anointed dictators and the disenfranchment of the majority" Jawar Mohammed @Danny, while discussing another current issue, a friend send us the following link
http://www.abugidainfo.com/index.php/10809/ I found it very relevant to the topic & my thoughts. Democratization; common goal (government t & people) to achieve; make war history; better attitude of ownership and responsibility; work for a better life and make poverty history!
---------------------
Costy B Costantinos:
New faces and forces of poverty and the demise of human, social, cultural, economic and political capital has led to the abject poverty where Ethiopia ranks only third form below in human development indicators, much below the phenomenal failed and genocidal states. This must force us to review our development strategies from a different ecological, social, economic and political perspective -- underscoring the paucity of our earlier paradigms on human adaptation to marginal environments. Environments marginalised by decades of incompetent and bad governments, the dependence of an ever-increasing population on a ‘finite’ resource base coupled with climatic changes have synergistically acted to create the poverty and vulnerability that ridiculously haunt the continent. Life is even made more exacting and demanding by the knowledge that only; a few of the millions who struggle for survival outlive the next subsistence meal.
Within a life span of something like four decades, the Ethiopian state has exhibited an enhanced degree of coercive power. This has resulted in a pervasive military ethos leading to the emergence of ‘socialist’-cum-military oligarchies through a long and painful process of ideological schooling. A major obstacle to efforts to install and consolidate democratic and developmental system in Africa is the all powerful, highly centralised and hierarchical bureaucratic structure; further exacerbated by economic adjustment programme, which antedated the democratisation process by almost a decade. The organisational imperative of the massive bureaucratic machine is to command and control and is preoccupied with its own survival and enrichment.
In relation to poverty and complex emergencies, conventional 'humanitarian' and 'development' discourse is now outmoded. It tells us little about protracted crisis and offers few policy innovations. Since the 1980s, in response to continuing economic polarisation and social upheaval a deregulated aid market has emerged; with the ad hoc proliferation of donor country international NGOs. In the space of a generation, the notion of 'development' has changed from one of large-scale infrastructural programmes to what, in practice, is little more than the international provision of basic public welfare functions. Organisational adaptation to emergencies is part of the globalisation of public policy. It is an ad hoc process, which defines in outline the emergence of a new system of global governance. Rather than societal convergence, the emerging system is adapted to the process of co-evolutionary and separate development that systemic crisis has given rise to. Within this new system, North-South relations are now being shaped by the interplay of Northern strategic concerns and aid market interests; resulting in the creation of new forces and faces of impoverishment.
Unfortunately, such lessons, which may be learned through the shocks administered by an uncompromising reality, are rarely translated quickly into personal or organisational memories and the inherent will to change. The reasons for this are sometimes rooted in human inertia, weakness and self-interest. They are equally often the product of a genuine confusion about how to act most effectively in an environment that seems to be growing more complex. Preparedness, relief, rehabilitation and disaster prevention are still seen as unilinear and mutually exclusive programmes to be implemented in linear succession; when our field experiences and the realities demand that all aspects of response should be seen as mutually supportive elements in one dynamic and dialectical process of developmental change. The highest priority now is to use the great collective experience to convert brutal disaster lessons into improved practices for the future.
Indeed, we are slowly coming to the realisation that effective poverty and disaster response requires a combination of three closely related perspectives in a single strategy: identify people’s vulnerability and their multifaceted coping mechanisms and stress strategies; to eliminate the vulnerabilities that are the bases of poverty and emergencies and to ensure that vulnerable people are protected by increasing the ability of communities to anticipate and respond to emergencies by developing self help systems. Preparedness should be a basis for sustaining life and maintaining the morale of affected groups in order to create the conditions for qualitative social change.
--------------------------------------------------------//-----------------------------------